District of New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 4,346
VILLEGAS v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2015cv03420
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. BONDS
as 2:2015cv03352
Petitioner: MICHAEL TAYLOR
Respondent: WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMMOND v. BAYSIDE STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2015cv03335
Petitioner: ALEEM HAMMOND
Respondent: BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. SHARTLE
as 1:2015cv03267
Petitioner: MANUEL C. JONES
Respondent: J.T. SHARTLE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BECHOLD v. YATES et al
as 2:2015cv03317
Petitioner: PAUL BECHOLD
Respondent: SHERRY YATES, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLETCHER v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2015cv03237
Petitioner: TIEHEEN FLETCHER
Respondent: PATRICK NOGAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIGIOVANNI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv03245
Petitioner: MARCO A. DIGIOVANNI
Respondent: STEVE JOHNSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2015cv03197
Petitioner: LEE JOHNSON
Respondent: STEPHEN D'ILIO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2015cv03197
Petitioner: LEE JOHNSON
Respondent: STEPHEN D'ILIO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. NOGAN
as 3:2015cv03159
Petitioner: KEVIN WILLIAMS
Respondent: PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.