US District Court for the District of New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,713
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CABRERA ARTEAGA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv05441
Petitioner:
SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA ARTEAGA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIZK v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv05575
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner:
SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04749
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner:
RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
