US District Court for the District of New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,329
JONES v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
as 1:2017cv12889
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND S. JONES
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv11843
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE RAHIM DAVIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFADDEN v. PASSAIC COUNTY
as 2:2017cv11670
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY , ANTHONY J. DE NOVA, III , RICHARD A. ASHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KENDELL SHAREEK MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv10921
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv08680
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2017cv05786
Plaintiff:
LAMONT MARCEL HALL, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv05175
Plaintiff:
DEBRA L ROGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRIOS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2017cv04918
Plaintiff:
RICARDO BERRIOS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv04845
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAY ROGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2017cv04649
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DWAYNE HARVEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
