US District Court for the District of New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 18,897
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04749
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MITROS v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv04759
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, ANTHONY JOHN MITROS, JR., SANDRA SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COSTIN v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv04705
Plaintiff:
JAMERE J. COSTIN
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, MEDICAL STAFF, Officer M. BOONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04857
Petitioner:
ALI HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner:
RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. EICKHOFF et al
as 1:2024cv04644
Plaintiff:
MARLON D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EICKHOFF and SGT. GOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
