US District Court for the Western District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,329
Doe v. City of Rochester, New York
as 6:2024cv06209
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Rochester, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kuriatnyk v. Piper et al
as 6:2024cv06196
Plaintiff:
Steven Kuriatnyk
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Samantha Simonetti, David Blaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lotta v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2024cv06194
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Lotta
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Monroe County Sheriff Office, Eric Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gorton v. Village of Sodus et al
as 6:2024cv06195
Plaintiff:
Victoria E Gorton
Defendant:
Village of Sodus, David Dyminski, Kevin Druschel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong v. Sinatra
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Paul Strong
Defendant:
Judge John L. Sinatra, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coleman v. Vining et al
as 6:2024cv06188
Plaintiff:
Laurene Marie Coleman
Defendant:
William Vining, State of New York and Kathy Koscioleck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Worthy v. Rodwin et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Worthy
Defendant:
Lisa Rodwin and David S. Sarkovics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
