New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 14,930
Wakefield v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2024cv06243
Petitioner:
John W. Wakefield
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pelaez v. Lowerre
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
Julio Pelaez
Respondent:
Superintendent E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaza v. Wendland
as 1:2024cv03175
Petitioner:
Ronald Plaza
Respondent:
Superintendent Rosemarie Wendland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03153
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of New York
as 9:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Leon A. Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Terrance Mack
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02948
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Nyc Dept of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kilgore v. Goodman
as 9:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Steven M. Kilgore
Respondent:
D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
