New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 14,928
Bettis v. All Known and Unknown Agents et al
as 1:2024cv02854
Petitioner:
Zubearu Bettis
Respondent:
All Known and Unknown Agents and Employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke and D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nazer v. Manhattan District Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv02713
Petitioner:
Izzat Nazer
Respondent:
Manhattan District Attorney and Warden at Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaye v. McGunnes
as 1:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kaye
Defendant:
Thomas T. McGunnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02535
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
Mayor Adams, NYC Dept. of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stines v. Superintendent
as 9:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Tyeree Stines
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rinaldi v. Warden FCI Otisville
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Michael Rinaldi
Respondent:
Warden FCI Otisville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
York v. King
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Donnell D. York
Respondent:
M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
