US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 37,271
Williams v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Sonya Felecia Williams
Defendant: City of Raleigh, Estella Patterson, Christopher D Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00248
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Amadi v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02060
Petitioner: Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department et al
as 5:2024ct03068
Plaintiff: Michael Rankins
Defendant: Windsor Police Department, City of Windsor, Bertie County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: Misheer Lyons
Defendant: Principal Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gerics v. Johnson
as 5:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Elisabeth Gerics
Defendant: Lauren Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff: Rodger Hanson
Defendant: Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03067
Plaintiff: Samuel Ellis
Defendant: Todd Ishee and Susan Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03070
Plaintiff: Dondell C. Davidson
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chavis v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03069
Plaintiff: Jeffery Ryan Chavis
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?