US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 895
Whitehead v. Veterans Administration Dept.
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jeffray Whitehead
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adomavicius v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 5:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jurgis Adomavicius
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Mitcheson et al v. Mistylou Investments, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hinton, Tiffany Gray, Kimberly Cozzens and others
Defendant:
Mistylou Investments, LLC doing business as Tobie's Gentlemen's Club and Brian Donald Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Phillips et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Betty Phillips and Calvin Phillips
Riggin v. ATF et al
as 5:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Wilbert B. Riggin
Defendant:
ATF and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Riggin v. ATF et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Wilbert B. Riggin
Defendant:
ATF and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dye v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dye
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castro v. Bell et al
as 5:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Karen Brinson Bell and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Honeycutt v. Stebbins et al
as 5:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Denise Honeycutt
Defendant:
Merriel Stebbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. FastMed Urgent Care, P.C.
as 5:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jackelyn Rodriguez
Defendant:
FastMed Urgent Care, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
