US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 180
BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FENTRISS
as 1:2017cv00936
Defendant:
LAURENCE C. FENTRISS
Plaintiff:
BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAMPER
as 1:2017cv00853
Defendant:
ALLAN C. LAMPER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ONSITE MAMMOGRAPHY, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
ONSITE MAMMOGRAPHY, LLC
Defendant:
WESTSIDE OB-GYN CENTER, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUEEN CITY MAINTENANCE, INC. V. MAINCORE MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00665
Defendant:
MAINCORE MANAGEMENT, LLC , ACTION TIME USA, INC. , DANIELA STANISLAWEK PERKINS and others
Plaintiff:
QUEEN CITY MAINTENANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDPORT, INC. v. MCGUIRE, et al.
as 1:2017cv00494
Plaintiff:
MEDPORT, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES E McGUIRE and DONNA McGUIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OSBORNE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. EDEN SHOPPING CENTER LLC
as 1:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
OSBORNE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
ECP COMMERCIAL I LLC and EDEN SHOPPING CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EMPAY SYSTEMS, LLC V. DON ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 1:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
EMPAY SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant:
DON ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T CORP. v. TRIDENT MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING, INC.
as 1:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
AT&T CORPORATION
Defendant:
TRIDENT MANAGMENT AND MARKETING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC. v. AKIONA
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Defendant:
CORAZON AKIONA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
JET MIDWEST INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. v. DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS, LLC
as 1:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
JET MIDWEST INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
Defendant:
DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
