US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 326
OXENDINE et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00529
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH OXENDINE and EULA JANE CLARK OXENDINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00389
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DORIS MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEESE et al v. ETHICON, INC. et at
as 1:2020cv00390
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RICKY DEESE and SANDRA SUE CHAVIS DEESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RENFROE v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00362
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA RENFROE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEDRICK v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00326
Defendant:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrell D. Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00286
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
TRACY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRIELL v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00285
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Murriell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00291
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYLER et al v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00290
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
DAVID TYLER and ANGELIQUE TYLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAIGE v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00288
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
GLENN PAIGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
