North Carolina Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,397
LIMITLESS BOSSABILITY LLC v. GFUNNEL INC.
as 1:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
LIMITLESS BOSSABILITY LLC
Defendant:
GFUNNEL INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Mountaintop Golf and Lake Club, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Mountaintop Golf and Lake Club, Inc., Mountaintop Properties, LLC, Discovery Land Company, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Old Cashiers Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Castaneda v. Castaneda et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Alexandrea N. Castaneda
Defendant:
Stephanie Renee Castaneda, Carlos R. Castaneda and Pack Memorial Librarians
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
