US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,218
Ray v. May
as 4:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Taquashone Ray
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. Bracy
as 3:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Angelo Bobby Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Charmain Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Terrez L. Carter
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piatt v. May
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Kyle C. Piatt
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. McConahay
as 1:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Jonathan Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenhart v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Christopher Lenhart
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Black
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Keith R. Cooper
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Healy
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Terry Clark
Respondent:
Warden Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marshall v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Juanito Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
