US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,216
Horne v. Rardin
as 4:2023cv01397
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Horne
Defendant:
Warden E. Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez Ruvalcaba v. Garland et al
as 5:2023cv01391
Petitioner:
Albino Lopez Ruvalcaba
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Director Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner:
Richard Lask
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. May
as 3:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Gerald G. Scott
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Luneke
as 1:2023cv01375
Petitioner:
Eugene Wade
Respondent:
Warden Doug Luneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith
as 1:2023cv01365
Petitioner:
Marlon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black and Director Annette Chambers-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booker-Brown v. Gray
as 5:2023cv01349
Petitioner:
Ernest A Booker-Brown
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armada v. Healy
as 3:2023cv01348
Petitioner:
Aurelio Seoane Armada
Respondent:
Warden Ian M. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fields v. Robinson
as 1:2023cv01340
Petitioner:
David Fields
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
