US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Cases 51 - 60 of 85,349
Dowdell v. Gaines
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Tamika Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ferris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Susan Ferris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Heinz v. State of Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Heinz
Defendant:
State of Ohio, David Yost, Eric N. Lindsey and others
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DiLuigi v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65377
Plaintiff:
Julianne DiLuigi
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elder v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65378
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elder
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plotts v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65379
Plaintiff:
Jay Plotts
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
