US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 371
Canaday v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Haley Canaday
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Toporek v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
Michael Toporek
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Leyva et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01930
Plaintiff:
Angela Leyva and Andrea Fahey
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bryski v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
Tova Bryski and Miriam Amselem
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Blake v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Beth Blake
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley et al v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KELLEY, JEREMY WILSON, DANTE MELENDEZ and others
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pickens et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Gregory Pickens and Ryan Rinz
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Henkel Corporation, et al
as 1:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
BRAD A DAVIS and Brad A. Davis
Defendant:
HENKEL CORPORATION and THRIVING BRANDS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00774
Plaintiff:
Marianna Campbell
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company and The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. The Procter and Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00734
Plaintiff:
Tyler Baker and Brian Stanfield
Defendant:
The Procter and Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
