US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,864
Wonser v. Norman et al
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wonser
Defendant:
Charles L. Norman, Andy Wilson and Thomas Stickrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Wright Patterson AFB
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ellis
Defendant:
Wright Patterson AFB
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Edwards v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Manning and Davyne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
North
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jerry North
Defendant:
Village of West Milton, Doyle Wright, James Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Blueprint Investments, LLC, Brysod Anderson, Aaron McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chapman v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Justin Davis, Consultants to Government and Industry Incorporated, 4 Real Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
