Southern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,151
Knauff v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv00338
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deresse v. Warden Marion Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02121
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Sheriff, Hamilton County Justice Center
as 1:2015cv00333
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diggs v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02117
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv00329
Petitioner: Nathaniel Webster, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saini v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv00181
Petitioner: Pardeep Sing Saini
Respondent: Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
as 3:2015cv00165
Petitioner: Christopher M Russell
Respondent: Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv00164
Petitioner: Timothy Jones
Respondent: Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vunda v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
as 1:2015cv00301
Petitioner: Paul D. Vunda
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v Warden, MCI
as 3:2015cv00161
Petitioner: Timothy Wright
Respondent: Warden, MCI
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.