US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 857
Lawton v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
Theodoric B. Lawton
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Neasbitt v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Russell E. Neasbitt
Respondent:
Christie Quick, Greg Breslin and Wallace Coppedge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brauning v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brauning v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
John Gilbert Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gray v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenuine v. Tuggle
as 6:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Jacob Benjamin Jenuine
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farrow v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
James Allen Farrow and James Alan Farrow
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Buss
as 6:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Thomas Jesse Ward
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ware-Mustapha v. Zooky
as 6:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
K. Zooky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
