US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,177
Malone v. Regalado
as 4:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Respondent:
Sheriff Vic Regalado and Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00186
Petitioner:
Daniel Cody Watkins
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sitsler v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Danny Joe Sitsler
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Lawrence Mayes and Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Petitioner:
Kimberly Graham
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Tracy Priddy and Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitts v. Regalado
as 4:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Colby Blake Fitts
Respondent:
Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chiwanga v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Jackson Peter Chiwanga
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Brown
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Byron Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone-Melton v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Gregory Kyle Malone-Melton
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
