Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,832
Moore v. Drummond
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Moore
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
Bryan Frank Perry
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckner v. Eastern Oklahoma District Court Sequoyah County
as 6:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Eddy Buckner
Defendant:
Eastern Oklahoma District Court Sequoyah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
John Miguel Swan
Respondent:
Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christensen v. Amonson et al
as 5:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
John E Christensen
Defendant:
Chris Amonson and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Felicia Brewer
Defendant:
FNU White, Grace Trahan, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper et al v. Weygand et al
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper and Deanna-Lyn Dale
Defendant:
Jordan Weygand, Robert Glasby, Steven Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jester Cole McKinney
Defendant:
Kyle Waters, Stacy Slaughter and Sequoyah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Samuel Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
