District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,872
Fox v. Marion County (Jail)
as 6:2015cv00890
Plaintiff: Randall L. Fox
Defendant: Marion County (Jail)
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cariveau v. Hendricks et al
as 6:2015cv00874
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Agard v. Castillo et al
as 3:2015cv00854
Plaintiff: Corey Agard
Defendant: Juan D Castillo, Marion Feather, Princess Haverly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reagle v. Marion County et al
as 6:2015cv00855
Defendant: Marion County, Marion County Jail, Marion County Jail Staff
Plaintiff: Scott M. Reagle
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2015cv00818
Plaintiff: Young Yil Jo
Defendant: Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama, Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2015cv00801
Defendant: Marion County Sheriff's Office-Jail, Medical Staff, Parole & Probation and others
Plaintiff: Robert L. Mathis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2015cv00789
Plaintiff: Rayquan Carnale Brooks
Defendant: Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv00785
Plaintiff: George A. Beltran
Defendant: Counselor Everhart, Warden Marion Feathers, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bepple et al v. Shelton et al
as 3:2015cv00727
Plaintiff: Kimberly Neal Bepple, Bridgette Lewis
Defendant: David Brown, Alana Bruns, James Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Wooten v. Kolsrud et al
as 2:2015cv00687
Defendant: Amber Kolsrud, Oregon Department of Justice
Plaintiff: David Wooten
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.