US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 654
IMMUNOTOPE, INC. v. CAPTIVATE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
as 2:2019cv04539
Plaintiff:
IMMUNOTOPE, INC.
Defendant:
CAPTIVATE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC and TULIN MORCOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
MIDWEST ATHLETICS AND SPORTS ALLIANCE LLC v. RICOH USA, INC.
as 2:2019cv03423
Defendant:
RICOH USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
MIDWEST ATHLETICS AND SPORTS ALLIANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
TIPPMANN ENGINEERING, LLC v. INNOVATIVE REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2019cv02913
Defendant:
INNOVATIVE REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TIPPMANN ENGINEERING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC v. IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2019cv01394
Plaintiff:
TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC
Defendant:
IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
LILLEBABY, LLC v. ARTSANA-USA INC.
as 5:2019cv00968
Plaintiff:
LILLEBABY, LLC
Defendant:
ARTSANA-USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GRAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. SEFAC S.A. et al
as 2:2019cv00899
Defendant:
SEFAC USA, INC., SEFAC S.A. and SEFAC USA INC.
Plaintiff:
GRAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SALVITTI et al v. LASCELLES
as 2:2019cv00696
Plaintiff:
ALFRED SALVITTI, NICO SALVITTI and JOHN-DAVID POTYNSKY
Defendant:
SCOTT LASCELLES and DANA DISABATINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
SKYLINE TOOLWORKS LLC v. TECHNA CLIP, LLC
as 2:2019cv00632
Defendant:
TECHNA CLIP, LLC
Plaintiff:
SKYLINE TOOLWORKS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NEURO AND CARDIAC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. NEURONETICS, INC.
as 2:2019cv00167
Defendant:
NEURONETICS, INC.
Plaintiff:
NEURO AND CARDIAC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BECON MEDICAL, LTD. v. BARTLETT et al
as 2:2018cv04169
Defendant:
TALEXMEDICAL, LLC and SCOTT P. BARTLETT
Plaintiff:
BECON MEDICAL, LTD. and HENRY STEPHENSON BYRD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
