US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,376
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zahnee v. DONALDSON et al
as 2:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
Edna Zahnee
Defendant:
RICHARD DONALDSON and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RAYNOR v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RYAN RAYNOR
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and DREAMWORKS ANIMATION STUDIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: GARVIN
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDAWAY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDAWAY v. HARDAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv01801
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
RAYMOND J HARDAWAY and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLENN
as 2:2024cv01792
Not Yet Classified:
PATRECE GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
