Middle District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases

Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 960
Culley et al v. The Cumberland Valley School District
as 1:2015cv00857
Plaintiff: Kevin Culley , Denise Culley , J.C.
Defendant: The Cumberland Valley School District
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Watkins v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2015cv00842
Plaintiff: Staci Watkins
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Shah v. Key 2 Recovery, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff: Yaasameen Shah
Defendant: Key 2 Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Gradwell v. Hamilton Law Group, P.C.
as 3:2015cv00816
Plaintiff: Raymond K Gradwell
Defendant: Hamilton Law Group, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Rajput v. Credit One Financial
as 1:2015cv00807
Plaintiff: Rachel Beidari Rajput
Defendant: Credit One Financial
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act of 1996
Monroe v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC
as 3:2015cv00794
Plaintiff: Charles Monroe
Defendant: Firstsource Advantage, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson National Life Insurance Company v. Lunt et al
as 3:2015cv00717
Plaintiff: Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Linda Lunt , Lisa Donovan , Lonnie Brice and others
Cause Of Action: Interpleader Action
Mauthe v. Versa Cardio, LLC
as 3:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: Robert W. Mauthe
Defendant: Versa Cardio, LLC
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act of 1996
Mauthe v. MedTech Imaging, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00656
Plaintiff: Robert W. Mauthe
Defendant: MedTech Imaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act
Eastlake v. Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
as 3:2015cv00636
Plaintiff: David Eastlake
Defendant: Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.