US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $1,550.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$1,550.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHECK PAYABLE TO THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPT IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,193.19 et al
as 2:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHECK PAYABLE TO THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPT IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,193.19 and CHECK PAYABLE TO THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,351.70
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VARIOUS FIREARMS
as 2:2006cv01605
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AND NUMBERED AS 514 GRIFFIN STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15211
as 2:2006cv01595
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VARIOUS FIREARMS
as 2:2006cv01392
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A KEL-TEC, 380 CALIBER PISTOL
as 2:2006cv01326
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $2,050.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2006cv01239
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $213,737.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 2:2006cv01169
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY EDWARD LAZORCHAK
as 2:2006cv01151
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $23,986.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2006cv00194
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
