Rhode Island Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 224
Budlong-Springer v. Conflict Resolution Training, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00207
Defendant:
Susan Deveney, Conflict Resolution Training, Inc., Zatony, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Millicent Alexis Budlong-Springer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Budlong-Springer v. Conflict Resolution Training, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Susan Deveney, Conflict Resolution Training, Inc., Zatony, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Millicent Alexis Budlong-Springer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Budlong-Springer v. Conflict Resolution Training, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Susan Deveney, Conflict Resolution Training, Inc., Zatony, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Millicent Alexis Budlong-Springer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vargas v. Universal Insulation, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Universal Insulation, Inc, Jorge Maldonado and Maro Maldonado
Plaintiff:
Byron Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCALIA v. LOS ANDES, LLC, d/b/a Los Andes Restaurant et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Cesin Curi, Omar Curi and Los Andres, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez v. Rudrah Darshan, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv00650
Defendant:
Krishna D. Construction, LLC., Darshan Gandhi and Rudrah Darshan, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Abraham Gonzalez
Turner v. Teknor Apex Company
as 1:2019cv00594
Defendant:
Teknor Apex Company
Plaintiff:
Gary S Turner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ariel Macklin v. Biscayne Holding Corp et al
as 1:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Christopher Vianello and Biscayne Holding Corp
Plaintiff:
Ariel Macklin
Pabon Molina v. The Cadillac Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Valentino Lombardi and The Cadillac Lounge, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daimarie Pabon Molina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
