US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Swann v. Google
as 1:2023mc00028
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Defendant:
Google
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hugunin v. State of Idaho et al (PLR1)
as 1:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Glacier Bancorp, Inc., Mountain West Bank, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hugunin v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Inc. (PLR3)
as 1:2020cv00007
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hugunin v. Winmill (PLR1)
as 1:2020cv00006
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brackfield & Associates Partnership et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Company (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00524
Plaintiff:
Brackfield & Associates Partnership and Eugene Brackfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Teal et al v. Coffee County Bank
as 4:2013cv00051
Defendant:
Coffee County Bank
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Teal and Oneta Kay Teal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Acton et al v. Regions Bank
as 3:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Donald W Acton and Mary K Acton
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. The First National Bank of McMinnville
as 3:2012cv00525
Plaintiff:
Don Anderson
Defendant:
The First National Bank of McMinnville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. American City Bank of Tullahoma
as 3:2012cv00526
Defendant:
American City Bank of Tullahoma
Plaintiff:
Don Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Security Federal Savings Bank of McMinnville
as 3:2012cv00527
Plaintiff:
Don Anderson
Defendant:
Security Federal Savings Bank of McMinnville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
