Eastern District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Henry v. Hospice of Chattanooga, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff: Warren W. Henry
Defendant: Hospice of Chattanooga, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hayes v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
as 4:2015cv00022
Plaintiff: James M Hayes
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Sloan v. Heil Trailer International, Co. (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00161
Plaintiff: Kathleen V. Sloan
Defendant: Heil Trailer International, Co.
Cause Of Action: Labor Litigation
Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff: Karen Smith
Defendant: Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC , Kevin Corbett , Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Edmonds v. Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff: Ricky Edmonds
Defendant: Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC , Gestamp North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Atchley v. Covenant Health et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00113
Plaintiff: Carlotta Stephens Atchley
Defendant: Covenant Health , Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Freeman v. AJ & Associates Dental, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00023
Plaintiff: Paula Freeman
Defendant: AJ & Associates Dental, P.C. , Aspen Dental Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Espinoza v. American Esoteric Laboratories, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00005
Plaintiff: Cynthia R Espinoza
Defendant: American Esoteric Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Grace v. OrthoTennessee, P.C. (TV1)
as 3:2014cv00588
Plaintiff: Suzanne Grace
Defendant: OrthoTennessee, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
1 2 3 4 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.