US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Hodge v. Lincoln Memorial University (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Selena Hodge
Defendant:
Lincoln Memorial University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Istre et al v. Hensley Partnership et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Philip Istre and William Chretien
Defendant:
Hensley Partnership and Marion Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Diggs v Paragon Management Group, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jacqulyn M Diggs
Defendant:
Paragon Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathes v. Greene County Detention Center et al
as 2:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
Billy A Mathes
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaylor v. First Federal Plaza, LLC (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00339
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Defendant:
First Federal Plaza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Kelly v. Burns et al
as 2:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Richard Erling Kelly
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Tom Metcalf, Bobby Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaylor v. Knoxville Center, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00213
Defendant:
Knoxville Center, LLC, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Belk Department Stores LP
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Gaylor v. The Shoppes at Hamilton Place, LLC
as 1:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Defendant:
The Shoppes at Hamilton Place, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Gaylor v. Ramco-Gershenson Properties, LP et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Defendant:
Ramco-Gershenson Properties, LP and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Gaylor v. Gunbarrel Commons, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaylor
Defendant:
Gunbarrel Commons, LLC and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
