US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,049
Gray v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00453
Petitioner: Jerry Rommell Gray
Respondent: Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mellon v. Morrow
as 3:2023cv00430
Petitioner: James A Mellon
Respondent: Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Eller
as 2:2023cv00158
Petitioner: Johnathan Allen
Respondent: Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Otey v. Rich
as 3:2023cv00428
Petitioner: Brandon I. Otey
Respondent: D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Swing We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00156
Petitioner: Johnathan Allen
Respondent: Austin Swing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Weaver v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner: Harry C Weaver, Jr
Respondent: Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner: Glenn Thomas Collins
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Defendant: Warden Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00372
Petitioner: MARCUS THOMAS
Respondent: Warden GRADY PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flemming v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00356
Petitioner: Nathan G. Flemming
Respondent: Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lambert v. Wardlow
as 2:2023cv00132
Plaintiff: James A Lambert
Defendant: Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?