US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,560
Fanter v. State of TN
as 3:2023cv01080
Petitioner:
Steven Joseph Fanter
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bigbee v. Janson
as 3:2023cv01070
Petitioner:
Tackerette Bigbee
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hill v. Law
as 2:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Shawn Wayne Hill
Respondent:
Jacob Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Pounds
as 3:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Jones
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Pounds
as 3:2023cv01063
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Jones
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of H/C-Death Penalty
McCoy v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01061
Petitioner:
Ronnie Tosh McCoy
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bailey v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Earsel Delano Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00919
Petitioner:
Jamarces J. Watson
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
