US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 108,128
Tire Zone, Inc. v. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
as 3:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Tire Zone, Inc.
Defendant:
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Whitworth Arms, LLC v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Whitworth Arms, LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Conley v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tiara Conley
Defendant:
Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Pulido v. Unit Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pulido
Defendant:
Unit Corporation, Unit Drilling Company and Unit Petroleum Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pimpton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Frederick Devell Pimpton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Warden King
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.