US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 32,836
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baiza v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Timothy Baiza
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Tiffany Graves, Myra Nkule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santana-Cerano v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Maribel Santana-Cerano
Defendant:
Warden FNU Rule, Warden FNU Cates, FNU Nodiand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quezada v. USP Tucson
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Graciano Pina Quezada
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Johnston et al
as 7:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Captain Holly Johnston, Captain Daryl Bonnin, Sheriff Sydney Kirk Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skelton v. Johnston et al
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Casey Skelton
Defendant:
Captain Holly Johnston, Deputy Stefanie Vickars, CO Joey Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Easton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hood v. Haskell County et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Scottie Lee Hood
Defendant:
Haskell County, Shane Hadaway, Chris Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
