US District Court for the Western District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,667
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Robert Babuji vs. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary U.S. Army
as 5:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Robert Babuji
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hanna v. Cangshan Cutlery Company
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HANNA
Defendant:
CANGSHAN CUTLERY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Haynes v. Shonaz Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Shonaz Foods, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIA Network et al v. The City of Kerrville
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
LIA Network, Liberty In Action, Terri Hall and others
Defendant:
The City of Kerrville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
