US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,594
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Benny Bundy and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbajal v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Carbajal
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez Venegas v. Warden, FCI Forrest City
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pate v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Saveedra Flores
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fonseca v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Timothy Fonseca
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Ryan Graves
Respondent:
Unites States of America and S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hutchins v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rubio v. Schmoker et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
James Rubio
Respondent:
Wayne Schmoker and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
