Texas Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 12,711
Aguero v. Sampan & Sea LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Roberto Aguero
Defendant:
Sampan & Sea LLC, Sheila CW Pang, Chung Keung Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cartee v. BBK Business, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Sara Cartee
Defendant:
BBK Business, LLC, Bijaya Bhusal and Dirga Kandel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Michel v. ADF Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Chris Michel
Defendant:
ADF Enterprises, Inc. and Dain F. Funderburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barrick et al v. Edge OFS Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Barrick and Scott Williams
Defendant:
Edge OFS Holdings, LLC and Gladiator Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Colbert v. Downhole Chemical Solutions, LLC
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joe Colbert
Defendant:
Downhole Chemical Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cybercoders, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor
as 4:2024xc00058
Petitioner:
Cybercoders, Inc.
Respondent:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Junani v. Kabani et al
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Azaan Junani
Defendant:
Kashif Kabani, Kabani Enterprises, Inc., Kabani Group LLC and others
Nichols v. GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Arlo Nichols
Defendant:
GEV WIND POWER U.S., LLC
Morales v. D and S Korea House, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO TZOY MORALES
Defendant:
D AND S KOREA HOUSE, LLC doing business as KOREA HOUSE and GIHEUNG DO
Hinojos v. Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kalleigh Hinojos
Defendant:
Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
