Texas Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 804
Williams v. Herc Rentals Inc.
as 5:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Joshua Williams
Defendant:
Herc Rentals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Luna v. SLMP, LLC
as 4:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Hilda Luna
Defendant:
SLMP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Flores v. The GI Alliance Management LLC
as 4:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
Coriena Flores
Defendant:
The GI Alliance Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Berryhill v. City Of Edinburg
as 7:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Wesley Berryhill
Defendant:
City Of Edinburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
LeBlanc v. Monument Chemical Port Arthur LLC
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
MAEGAN LEBLANC and Meagan Alexis LeBlanc
Defendant:
Momument Chemical Port Arthur, LLC, Texas KMTEX, Monument Chemical Port Arthur LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Quintana v. Taco Cabana L.P.
as 5:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Quintana
Defendant:
Taco Cabana L.P. and Ofelia Davila
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC
as 4:2023cv02453
Plaintiff:
Athena Lopez
Defendant:
Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Puente v. Hebco GP, LLC.
as 4:2023cv02395
Plaintiff:
Nefty Puente
Defendant:
Hebco GP, LLC. doing business as HEB Grocery Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Henry v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
