US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,339
Oralic Supplies Inc. v. Huang
as 3:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Oralic Supplies Inc.
Defendant:
Jiang Huang
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Lisa Draxlmaier GmbH et al v. Faurecia Interieur Industrie
as 1:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Lisa Drxlmaier GmbH, Draexlmaier Automotive of America LLC and Lisa Draxlmaier GmbH
Defendant:
Faurecia Interieur Industrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Eickmeyer & Associates, Inc. v. Capsol-EoP AS et al
as 1:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Eickmeyer & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Capsol-EoP AS and CO2 Capsol AS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement
DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. OVH GROUPE et al
as 1:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
DataCloud Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
OVH GROUPE and OVH US LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00840
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Nano IP, LLC v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
Nano IP, LLC
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Logipix Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Logipix Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
