Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 13,400
Snead v. Covington VA
as 7:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Covington VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Matthew Don Blackwell
Defendant:
T. Joseph Stiltner, Jack S. Hurley, Jr. and Unknown Court Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. SWRJA, Abingdon, VA Medical et al
as 7:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Rocky Lee Woodard
Defendant:
SWRJA, Abingdon, VA Medical and SWVRJA, Abingdon, VA Chaplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Patrick County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Seth D. Palmer
Defendant:
Patrick County Sheriffs Office, Deputy Kenny, Deputy Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
T'von Maurice Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff Antoinette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. S.W.V.R.J.A.
as 7:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dean Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Joshua Melvin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Richardson v. Bell
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson
Defendant:
Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
