US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,912
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bishop-McKean v. Murray et al
as 3:2024cv05199
Plaintiff:
Renee Bishop-McKean
Defendant:
Justin Murray, Carlson, Paul Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05202
Plaintiff:
Melissa Long
Defendant:
Clark County, Pamela Frisby, Dollie Drape and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Clark County et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Melissa Long
Defendant:
Clark County, NaphCare, Inc., KENNETH CHENG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. King County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dwight Harris
Defendant:
King County Jail, King County Chaplain Department, King County Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Joy et al
as 3:2024cv05198
Plaintiff:
Horace Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Anna Joy, Sandra Aldridge and Vancouver Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plechner v. Haynes
as 3:2024cv05187
Petitioner:
Richard Plechner
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Victor Tuli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
