US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,914
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nguyen v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Anh Vu Nguyen
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Mason County et al
as 3:2024cv05291
Plaintiff:
Rustin Lee Rouse and Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Mason County, Randy Newell, Kevin Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalek v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv05289
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Michalek
Defendant:
Hopkins, Wright-Brown, Lungsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Branch v. Boe
as 2:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Derrick Branch
Respondent:
Jeri Boe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
