Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 554
Hathaway v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Conner Anthony Hathaway
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patu v. David
as 2:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Solomona Ricky Patu
Defendant:
David David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beadle v. Smolich
as 2:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Morgan Lee Beadle
Defendant:
David Smolich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv05247
Plaintiff:
Taylor Christopher Miles
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Douglas Watkins, G Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Washington Corrections Center
as 3:2022cv05219
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Washington Corrections Center, Washington State Department of Corrections, Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Washington Corrections Center
as 3:2022cv05220
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Washington Corrections Center, Washington Department of Corrections, Manigo-Hedt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beadle v Cogburn
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Morgan Lee Beadle
Defendant:
Calvin Cogburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vance v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Joshua Leroy Vance
Defendant:
Robin J Smith and Kenneth Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Hicks and Ronnie Lee Hicks, II
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Frantz, Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. City of Seattle
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Christian Michael Fisher
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.