West Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Glessner v. Surratt House Museum et al
as 3:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Deloris Glessner
Defendant:
Surratt House Museum and Laurie Verge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Cafego v. Community Holdings of West Virginia, Inc.
as 5:2013cv11023
Plaintiff:
Scott Cafego
Defendant:
Community Holdings of West Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Hardy-Green v. Awad
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Eileen Ann Hardy-Green
Defendant:
April Morrison Awad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Glessner v. Surratt House Museum et al
as 3:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Deloris Glessner
Defendant:
Surratt House Museum and Laurie Verge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Robinson v. Res-Care, Inc.
as 2:2012cv05672
Plaintiff:
Margaret I. Robinson
Defendant:
Res-Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Dean v. Snowshoe Mountain, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Patterson v. City of South Charleston, West Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv01964
Plaintiff:
Wayne Patterson
Defendant:
City of South Charleston, West Virginia , R. T. Yeager , T. A. Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Donald Dickens
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcum v. Rockspring Development, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00990
Plaintiff:
Arzella M. Marcum
Defendant:
Rockspring Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Harper University Hospital et al
as 3:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald K. Harris
Defendant:
Harper University Hospital and Donald Weaver, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
