Payne v. Freeman Transit, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Mark Payne
Defendant: Freeman Transit, LLC and Christopher Freeman
Case Number: 2:2022cv02113
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: P K Holmes
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/22/2022. Bench Trial set for 6/26/2023 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on August 16, 2022. (jas)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Freeman Transit, LLC. (mjm)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Freeman Transit, LLC.(mjm)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Christopher Freeman.(mjm)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Honea on behalf of Freeman Transit, LLC. (mjm)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Honea on behalf of Christopher Freeman. (mjm)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Christopher Freeman, Freeman Transit, LLC and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (mjm)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Christopher Freeman and Freeman Transit, LLC for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Sanford, Josh)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Christopher Freeman, Freeman Transit, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2625541), filed by Mark Payne.(Sanford, Josh)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Mark Payne. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (mjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Freeman Transit, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Payne
Represented By: Josh Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freeman Transit, LLC
Represented By: Robert M. Honea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Freeman
Represented By: Robert M. Honea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?