Dunigan v. United States et al
| Kevin Dunigan |
| United States, DEA, ATF, FBI, CIA, DOJ, People of the State of California, CDCR, SEC and IRS |
| 2:2010cv02965 |
| November 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Imperial |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/21/12 ORDERING that 16 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED; it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and for plaintiffs failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/5/11, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Matter referred to Judge England. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Kevin Dunigan signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/5/11. (Duong, D) (CFS) Modified on 4/5/2011 (Duong, D).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
