Clark v. Cook et al
| Nicholas Clark |
| Cook, Corcella, Gerald Valletta, Coleman, Scott Semple, Ruiz, Goodman and Scott Erfe |
| 3:2019cv00575 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed c/o Attorney General by Nicholas Clark. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 13
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Gerald Valletta; waiver sent on 6/5/2019, answer due 8/4/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Gerald Valletta* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Nicholas Clark / 355139* *GARNER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION* *50 Nunnawauk Rd.; P.O.Box 5500* *Newtown, CT 06470*., USM 285 forms together with Summons, Complaint, Order granting IFP reviewed and sent to USM for service on defendant(s).(Marshals Return of Service on Summons due by 6/25/2019) (Velez, F.)
|
|
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Dr. Gerald Valletta on 6/5/2019; Waiver of Service due by 7/10/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/22/2019. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. The case will proceed on the deliberate indifference to medical needs claim against Dr. Valletta in his individual and official capacities and the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against him in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/22/2019. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 5/20/2019. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nicholas Clark. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperi. Although you have sworn under the penalty of perjury that the responses in the IFP application are truthful, the responses in question 6 do not accurately reflect the deposit shown on your Inmate Account Statement. Please file a new IFP application. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 5/16/2019 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 4/25/2019.(Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 6
EXHIBIT - Additional Attachments, by Nicholas Clark re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/17/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/17/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/17/2019. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Nicholas Clark. (Velez, F.) Modified on 4/18/2019 to add PRISCS (Velez, F.).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Dr. Coleman; Cook, Commissioner; Corcella, Warden; Scott Erfe, Warden; Dr. Goodman; Dr. Ruiz; Scott Semple, Former Commissioner; Dr. Gerald Valletta, filed by Nicholas Clark. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope). (Velez, F.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
