McKenzie v. United States Of America

Respondent: United States Of America
Petitioner: Errol McKenzie
Case Number: 5:2013cv00024
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Waycross Office
County: Charlton
Referring Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 12, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss is granted. The Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/12/2013. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKenzie v. United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Of America
Represented By: R. Brian Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Errol McKenzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.