Young v. Owens et al
Damon Young |
Brian Owens, Smith, Danny Horne, Bruce Chatman, John Paul, Valiant Lyte and D.O.C. Central Office Administration |
6:2013cv00032 |
April 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Statesboro Office |
Bulloch |
James E. Graham |
B. Avant Edenfield |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 107 Motion for Copies. Mr. Cobb may purchase case records in the captioned matter by tendering payment in the amount of $255.50 before the records may be provided. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/22/2018. (pts) |
Filing 103 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 4/1/15. (wwp) |
Filing 85 ORDER ADOPTING 61 Report and Recommendations granting in part and denying in part the 44 Motion to Dismiss filed by Jack Koon, Tom McElhenney, Suzanne York, Randy Tillman, Brian Owens, Danny Horne, Arnold Smith, Jackie L. Kelsey, John Paul, Johnny Sikes, Valiant Lyte, Bruce Chatman. Defendant's 64 Objections are overruled. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/26/14. (wwp) Modified on 6/26/2014 (wwp). |
Filing 58 ORDER denying 53 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/30/2014. (loh) |
Filing 43 ORDER ADOPTING re 24 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 11/20/2013. (loh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.