William M. McDermott v Marcus et al
| William Michael McDermott |
| Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C. |
| 1:2009cv10159 |
| February 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Essex |
| Mark L. Wolf |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees (Docket Entry 85 ) is ALLOWED to the extent that plaintiff is entitled to an attorneys fee award of $39,898.10 and costs in the amount of $2,157.60. (Costa, Susan)
|
|
Filing
77
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. MEEBs Rule 59(e) motion (Docket Entry 68 ) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. MEEB is not liable under chapter 93A or section 1692i. Plaintiff remains entitled to $800.00 i n statutory damages under Count One but is not entitled to relief under Count Two. The judgment is amended to eliminate the $10,400.00 in damages under Count Two including prejudgment interest in the amount of $4,649.00. Plaintiffs Rule 59(e) motion (Docket Entry 66 ) is DENIED. This court will conduct a status conference to set a briefing schedule for the attorneys fees issues on September 16, 2013, at 2:30 p.m.(Garvin, Brendan)
|
|
Filing
64
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. FINAL JUDGMENT. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that plaintiff William M. McDermott recover of defendant Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C. the sum of $11,200.00 with prejudgment interest of $4,649.00 along with costs.(Feeney, Eileen)
|
|
Filing
62
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE TRIAL BRIEF OF THIRTY-SEVEN PAGES OR FOR ADDITIONAL TIMETO FILE TRIAL BRIEF (DOCKET ENTRY # 59). The motion for leave (Docket Entry # 59) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part inasmuch as this court will consider the brief except for footnote one.(Feeney, Eileen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: William M. McDermott v Marcus et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Michael McDermott | |
| Represented By: | Phillip H. Cahalin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
